VAN BERGEN VS, RIEM VIS R, BRINKGREVE J, STELMA J & NIJLUSING W (2021) Parental care by a pair of Honey Buzzards Pernis apivorus: investments in reproduction, survival and predation risk, assessed by monitoring nests with camera traps. LIMOSA 94 (3): 89-100.
In raptors with biparental care but sex-specific roles, adults
are facing a trade-off between food provisioning and
protection of the brood at the nest against predation and
adverse weather. We followed the breeding cycle of a pair of
Honey Buzzards in the north of the Netherlands with camera
traps at their nest sites in 2015 and 2016. We monitored nests
by using two different camera trap settings: the time-lapse
function (camera programmed to take one picture every
minute) and motion trigger function (camera programmed
to take one picture in response to movement). To determine
nest attendance and prey delivery, we used one camera with
the time-lapse function in 2015 and two cameras in 2016 (one
with the time-lapse function and one with the motion trigger
function). The consecutive nests in 2015 and 2016 were 4.2
kilometres apart. In both years, the female incubated the
eggs about two-thirds of the time. In 2015 the nest had two
chicks, that were both depredated by a European Pine Marten
Martes martes at 8:28 AM local time when the oldest chick
was 27 days old. In 2016 only one of the two eggs hatched,
and the nestling fledged successfully. Adult nest attendance
was lower in 2015 during the nestling phase as compared to
2016, especially shortly before the brood was depredated
(Fig. 1 and 2). We propose that the higher food demand and
possibly lower food availability in 2015 caused the female to
more often assist the male in hunting. This resulted in lower
nest attendance and a consequently higher predation risk.
Common Wasp Vespula vulgaris was the most frequent prey
in both years, resp. 29.4% and 43.5% (Appendix 1 and 2). Prey
were better identified by the motion trigger camera trap
than by the time-lapse camera trap. Like in most raptors,
usually the male brought prey to the nest while the female
provided the young with direct care at the nest. In 2016, the
female visited the nest for the last time when the chick was
45 days old. The male appeared for the last time on the nest
when the chick had an age of 54 days.
For monitoring nest attendance and prey delivery rates,
we advise to use one camera trap with a combination of
the time-lapse (one picture per minute) and the motion
trigger (three pictures with a three seconds interval and a
'quiet period' of five minutes) function, with the time-lapse
function off during the night time. With these settings,
camera traps continued working for 10 to 14 days on one set
of batteries, collecting the maximum amount of information.
[pdf only for members] [dutch summary]
|