VAN DEN BREMER L, VAN TURNHOUT C, SCHEKKERMAN H, DEUZEMAN S, VAN DER JEUGD H & FOPPEN R (2019) Can differential population trends of Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita and Willow Warbler Phylloscopus trochilus be explained by changes in survival and reproduction?. LIMOSA 92 (1): 36-44.
Common Chiffchaff and Willow Warbler are common breeding birds in the
Netherlands. The population indexes
derived from the Common Bird Census in The Netherlands over the period
1984-2017 show a moderate increase
for Common Chiffchaff, with large
fluctuations, and a steady decrease for
Willow Warbler (Fig. 1), with notable differentiations between habitats (Fig. 2).
Annual population changes over 1996-
2015 were best explained by variation
in adult (both species) and first-year
(Common Chiffchaff) apparent survival
as estimated from the Dutch Constant
Effort Site mistnetting scheme (Fig. 4),
not by the breeding productivity index
derived from the same scheme. Firstyear survival of Willow Warblers was
related to the weather in June and July:
the drier and warmer these months,
the higher the first-year survival. Conditions in winter and during migration seem to have some influence on
the survival of adult Willow Warblers:
in dry years in the African Sahel zone
the survival decreased. We found no
relation between the survival of Common Chiffchaff and weather in Dutch
breeding areas (temperature and precipitation) and in wintering areas in
Southwestern Europe (NAO-index).
Causes of annual fluctuations in numbers and demographic parameters are
not necessarily decisive for long-term
population developments. We discuss
possible underlying factors driving the
contrasting trends of both species. It is
plausible that changes in the landscape
in the breeding areas play a significant
role in this. Succession of forests and a
decrease of forest plantations due to
changes in forest management have
a negative impact on Willow Warbler
breeding habitat. However, the conditions experienced in the non-breeding
season may also be important. Identifying the key drivers of these population changes is complex, and currently
hampered by the lack of information
on breeding data (in particular nesting
success). The strong correlation with
the European indexes for both species
(Fig. 1) suggests a strong underlying
mechanism that is active on a large
geographical scale.
[pdf only for members] [dutch summary]
|